Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change

By Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire
Sept 30, 2010

It’s the latest in a series of high-profile set-backs suffered by global warming theorists- the UK’s leading scientific body has decided to rewrite its own definitive guide on climate change, now admitting that it is “not known” how much warmer the planet will become.

The Royal Society has released a new guide which outlines a retreat from its former vanguard stance on the threat of climate change and man-made global warming. The decision to update their scientific guide came after 43 of its members complained that the previous versions failed to take into account the opinion of climate change sceptics.

The new guide, entitled ‘Climate change: a summary of the science’, concedes that there are now major ‘uncertainties’ regarding the once sacred ‘scientific consensus’ behind man-made global warming theory, admitting that not only is it impossible to know for sure how the Earth’s climate will change in the future but it cannot possibly know what the effects may be. The 19-page guide states clearly, ’It is not possible to determine exactly how much the Earth will warm or exactly how the climate will change in the future, but careful estimates of potential changes and associated uncertainties have been made”.

The guide continues stating, “There is currently insufficient understanding of the enhanced melting and retreat of the ice sheets on Greenland and West Antarctica to predict exactly how much the rate of sea level rise will increase above that observed in the past century for a given temperature increase”.

In a Sept 20, 2010 article published on the UK Daily Mail, Professor Anthony Kelly, academic advisor to  Britain’s Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) explains, ”The previous guidance was discouraging debate rather than encouraging it among knowledgeable people. The new guidance is clearer and a very much better document”.

The decision to revise and tone down its alarmist position on climate change demonstrates a clear u-turn on its previous 2007 climate pamphlet, one which is said to have caused an internal rebellion by the 43 fellows of the Society, triggering a review and subsequent revision. The 2007 publication, which parroted the IPCC’s popular, but misleading impression that the ‘science is settled’ – made way for the new guide which accepts that important questions remain open and uncertainties unresolved. “The Royal Society now also agrees(with us) that the warming trend of the 1980s and 90s has come to a halt in the last 10 years,” said Dr Benny Peiser, the Director of GWPF.

Economic realities and a marked shift in public opinion since last year’s Climategate scandal and failure of the much-hyped UN Copenhagen Summit have triggered a series of falling dominos within the climate change and anthropogenic global warming (AGW) orthodoxy. The Royal Society’s shift also follows last week’s blow to the radical climatist agenda within Britain, where the new Coalition Government announced it will be slashing its Climate Change Department’s budget and folding the former free-standing bureaucracy into the Treasury department.


The UN's "Hopenhagen" Summit ended in failure as no real binding agreement could be reached (PHOTO: Patrick Henningsen)


Some analysts also believe that the Society’s new guide does not go far enough. Dr David Whitehouse, the science editor of the GWPF said: “The biggest failing of the new guide is that it dismisses temperature data prior to 1850 as limited and leaves it at that. It would cast a whole new light on today’s warming if the Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period and the Bronze Age Warm Period were as warm as today, possibility even warmer than today. A thorough discussion of the growing empirical evidence for the global existence of the Medieval Warm Period and its implications would have been a valuable addition to the new report.”

In addition, this retreat by the Royal Society signals a very real trend in climate science circles where political activism is slowly being replaced by a more sober assessment of the scientific evidence and ongoing climate debates.

The Political Fallout

To date, the political activist engine powering climate change has been anchored by an elite circle of scientists, foundations, green journalists, carbon financiers- and politicians looking for a good cause. The fuel for this engine has been supplied by short-term economic opportunities, most of which has been in the form of massive research grants, subsidies and feed-in tariffs(triggering a rise in energy costs to the consumer) by the State and confederate bodies like the UN and the European Union. In the US, problems with climate change inspired instruments like Cap and Trade are more chronic, where North America’s sole carbon trading market, the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), has recently been scaled down following a decline in investment and the near complete collapse in carbon emission prices.

As formerly obedient IPCC scientists and insiders gradually break ranks and defect over to the common sense camp, and foundations like the Royal Society reverse their policies on the nature of the climate threat, politicians may lose the once reliable traction they enjoyed when promoting their various green agendas.

This is followed, of course, by the economic reality of any democracy whereby taxpayers cannot really back departments, much less policies, that do not deliver a measured benefit to the public welfare. If the IPCC’s elite chamber of scientists cannot be trusted to objectively measure past global temperatures (actual UN data sets show that there has been no temperature increase since circa 1998), then it goes without saying that politicians cannot build real-world policy catering for a crisis that is not actually happening. The rising tide of scepticism and the reemergence of real scientific analysis will surely spell an end to the innumerable faith-based policies and guesswork forecasting that has plagued the climate change movement to date.

As science gradually makes its way back into line with reality and real world observation, it follows that many of the climate bureaucracies erected since 2000 will stumble as a result. The reason for this phenomenon is spelled out in the basic laws of ‘political physics’; a collapse of the so-called “scientific consensus” comes into direct conflict with one of the main tenets of politics- plausible deniability. When politicians can no longer use scientists as scapegoats, as in “it’s not our fault, they told us CO2 was heating up the planet…”, then the political agenda is all but dead.

The reality curve is certainly catching up to climate change now.


21st Century Wire EXCLUSIVE VIDEO REPORTS from Copenhagen 2009



About the author: Patrick Henningsen is an independent writer, filmmaker, communications consultant and managing editor of 21st Century Wire.



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change”

  1. klem Says:

    The Royal Society should replace the UN IPCC.

  2. Patrick Says:

    Here, here!

  3. Bill Vancouver Says:

    The wheels on Al Gore’s little red wagon are starting to fall off. All he needs to do is openly debate any one of a number of challengers, but his refusal to do so only deepens the pit into which his hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming is falling.
    You don’t suppose the reason he won’t personally or with the backing of his leading lemmings debate is that he knows climate science is not in his corner, do you?
    Did anyone notice the Chicago Carbon Exchange price for carbon is down to $0.10 per ton and that they have basically shut down? There is a rebellion against this AGW scam. The public knows it, Gore knows it, and hopefully our politicians will soon know it, too. Then we can turn our economic engine (gas burning) on and put people back to work.

    • 21st Century Wire Says:

      It is only a question of time, as the actual temp records come rolling in each year, it will show the true story. Al Gore will be hiding at that point, no doubt he will probably throw himself into some cause or new charity project to try and rebuild his public image as Ickaris- a carbon god fallen to earth for flying too close to the sun.

  4. Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change « Says:

    […] Patrick Henningsen 21st Century Wire […]

  5. R_of_R Says:

    How many billions in taxpayer dollars & pounds have poured down this rathole of fraud, enriching EVIL liars and propagandists? The level of scams is getting so shocking – AGW, fake pandemics to enrich bug pharma and sell poison vaccines, fraudulent foreclosures in the hundreds of thousands. So, these criminals are backing away from their AGW fraud, the non pandemic was an epic FAIL, and the big banks have now stopped foreclosures because they’ve been found out. Well, sorry but that doesn’t cut it. ALL of these bastards should be in prison or worse.

  6. Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change « Don't hate me because I'm right. Says:

    […] Change, Global Warming, New World Order, News Item Leave a comment By Patrick Henningsen 21st Century Wire Sept 30, […]

  7. The Royal Society: Planetary Warming Uncertain « The Real Agenda Says:

    […] Patrick Henningsen […]

  8. Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change « I Hate Al Gore Says:

    […] Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change jQuery(document).ready(function($) { window.setTimeout('loadFBShareMe_1908()',5000); }); function loadFBShareMe_1908(){ jQuery(document).ready(function($) { $('.dd-fbshareme-1908').remove();$('.DD_FBSHAREME_AJAX_1908').attr('width','53');$('.DD_FBSHAREME_AJAX_1908').attr('height','69');$('.DD_FBSHAREME_AJAX_1908').attr('src',''); }); }source: 21st Century Wire […]

  9. Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change | Times of Freedom Says:

    […] Patrick Henningsen 21st Century Wire Sept 30, […]

  10. Wiccan Forum Says:

    Merry Meet. I really think so too=P I have been surfing around the internet for a while today, and its really hard to find something entertaining to read on blogs=P Maybe thats because there are too much of them around =) But this place actually keeps catching my attention=] Great stories, and kawai design ^__^. Ill be sure to give it more visits from now on 😛

  11. Enrique Maio Says:

    There is no question in my mind, now I am convinced Now I know all I wanted to know, thanks for this article!

  12. corporate photographer Says:

    I would say that it is my very first time browsing your website. Now this is the kinda of stuff i like to read about. Excellent website. I just finished mine and i was looking for some ideas and you gave me a few. I bookmarked your post will read this latter.

    • Hiba Says:

      It is my iemsprsion that Dr. Mann is key to this study not because of his subject expertise but his other qualities:1 he has skill in formatting information to persuade a broad audience2 he knows the ropes and has the connections to draw government funding3 he has name recognition and will guarentee media coverage of the results4 his study results will be assured to show a causal relationship5 government will get what it is paying for

  13. Bill Vancouver Says:

    What is the Royal Society’s position now that 2010 is ending? We need an update.
    Has the third bitter winter in a row made any impression on The Met or the Royal Society? How many more years in the current cooling period until the U.K. and U.S. administrations admit that natural forces other than CO2 significantly influence global climate? The hypothesis that manmade CO2 causes global warming is the biggest scam in the history of mankind.

  14. 21st Century Wire: Most Hit Stories of 2010 « 21st Century Wire Says:

    […] 6. Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change […]

  15. AliceIndex Says:

    Awesomely made post. Are you a journalist? Where can I register in for your future content?

  16. hotel wesel Says:

    Appreciate you creating this web site and sharing your viewpoint.

  17. insurance forums Says:

    An impressive share, I merely given this onto a colleague who was doing small analysis with this. Anf the husband actually bought me breakfast since I discovered it for him.. smile. So well then, i’ll reword that: Thnx to the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to talk about this, I feel strongly regarding this and enjoy reading much more about this topic. If you can, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with additional details? It is actually extremely great for me. Big thumb up for this short article!

  18. Plants vs Zombies Android Says:

    Man I love this post and it was so good and I am definetly going to save it. One thing to say the Indepth analysis you have done is trully remarkable.No one goes that extra mile these days? Well Done!

  19. ps3 mods Says:

    The next time I read a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as a lot as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I truly thought youd have something attention-grabbing to say.

  20. Kieth Sponseller Says:

    This article was very well written, I have found this blog on Google. I will bookmark this site and come back often, thank you for all your time and effort, cheers.

  21. quotes on love Says:

    Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change 21st Century Wire I was recommended this blog by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem. You’re amazing! Thanks! your article about Another Domino Falls: UK’s Leading Scientific Body Retreats on Climate Change 21st Century Wire Best Regards Veronica Nick

  22. THE LASTEST SCAM: U.S. ‘climate aid’ targets poorest nations with financial incentives « 21st Century Wire Says:

    […] It’s quite astonishing that almost no advocate of anthropogenic global warming or “climate change” (it’s quite a semantic luxury they have, being able to shape-shift between two different names) will appear in public or on TV anymore to extol the virtues of their half-baked philosophy. That’s mainly because they have ran out of rope for their argument. ”The science is settled”, as Al Gore once proclaimed, only he lost the debate and the IPCC was exposed as an multi-million dollar fraud – and exposed over and over again. Even the Royal Society in Great Britain finally dumped it in 2010. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: